tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084144703351548082.post2568379297343839151..comments2023-10-29T10:23:27.584-05:00Comments on Androcass: Blogging fatigueEric Easterberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11535369798458596223noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084144703351548082.post-53872134561505491522008-09-23T11:42:00.000-05:002008-09-23T11:42:00.000-05:00The commenter continues to perplex me. Trend follo...The commenter continues to perplex me. Trend follower? Because I (tongue in cheek) suggest more images? I'm a visual information artist. Here's an example of my work:<BR/><BR/>http://ljmindmap.com/h.aspx?n=mcfnord<BR/><BR/>To argue that visual stimulus is akin to heroin issued by the corporate teat is both dour and hilarious. What a depressing life it must be when one relegates imagery to the realm of idiocy and danger.<BR/><BR/>But Androcass, if you want, you can think of this anon as a thug who comes seemingly to your defense with abusive rhetoric when you call. So you've made a friend? And he's the reader market for anti-globalist business verbiage? This can't feel good to you. But ok.<BR/><BR/>Gotta go to my idiot job now! ttyl broAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084144703351548082.post-39557909718024008342008-09-23T00:49:00.000-05:002008-09-23T00:49:00.000-05:00You're crazy. And I'm off to follow the trend!You're crazy. And I'm off to follow the trend!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084144703351548082.post-35684934070589521442008-09-22T22:46:00.000-05:002008-09-22T22:46:00.000-05:00Mcfnord is a trend follower so I would not care fo...Mcfnord is a trend follower so I would not care for his comments.<BR/><BR/>We should be to assess Mcfnord's intelligence level by his/her own words: <BR/><BR/>1) "PS. want traffic? more funny pics"' "Perhaps your self-image is not accurate?", "I have NEVER branded you a loser or a failure".<BR/><BR/>Our actions and words reflect our views on the outer world - pictures, image, and brand are all instant vision stimulus for those who would easily subjugate themselves to be brainwashed by the mass media and the hypes. <BR/><BR/>Well, one advice you should consider when you see future postings of mcfnord ... "focusing on average idiots is the last thing you need!"<BR/><BR/>Regards<BR/>SNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084144703351548082.post-10420552193650742572008-09-22T17:34:00.000-05:002008-09-22T17:34:00.000-05:00You describe yourself as a potential high-flier (o...<B>You describe yourself</B> as a potential high-flier (or at least deep thinker) surrounded by mediocracy (or at least shallow thinkers). I'm convinced you're smart. I'm not sure why you work with mediocre people. Perhaps you aren't good at labor marketing? Perhaps your self-image is not accurate? I'm not sure yet. But: I have NEVER branded you a loser or a failure.<BR/><BR/>I do think you might give mediocre people and their mediocre ideas more truck than they deserve. I have criticized you for studying second-rate news sources in the past. People magazine and those who read it? Don't focus there. Surely there are people and publications worth your focus! Focusing on average idiots is the last thing you need!<BR/><BR/>Bring back the brash, passionate Androcass! All this wheel-spinning matters, right? I think it does, but perhaps not in the ways you and I think.<BR/><BR/>Executives understand the long-term effects of offshoring <I>for their enterprises</I>, and the larger issues are not their concern.<BR/><BR/>I'd really like you to try to link your perception of working with "blank stare" people to your criticisms of offshoring. I think that's a fruitful direction. I don't know if you've articulated it so directly: You work with glassy-eyed dullards because all the good jobs left the country? Is that it? Am I even getting luke warm yet?<BR/><BR/>your reader,<BR/>mcfnord<BR/><BR/>p.s. want traffic? more funny pics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com